Home » Feature » Opinion: GMC Should Bring Back Jimmy
Opinion: GMC Should Bring Back Jimmy

Opinion: GMC Should Bring Back Jimmy

It seems nostalgia is a thing right now in the SUV world. The Ford Explorer name is back, Jeep is bringing back the Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer nameplates and Ford has confirmed the return of the iconic Bronco. Consumers have a love affair with SUVs and automakers are pulling all the strings to attract buyers, including throwbacks of the past.

The only Detroit OEM that has yet to dust off an SUV name from the past thus far is General Motors. Part of the reason they haven’t is because they still sell some legendary SUVs, including the oldest nameplate in the industry, the Suburban. There’s also Tahoe, Yukon and Escalade of more recent history.

But with Jeep rolling out an all-new Wrangler this year and Ford confirming the return of the Bronco, isn’t it time GM enter the small off-roader segment as well? We think so, and the GMC Jimmy is the perfect throwback for it.

The Jimmy name has been on ice since 2005, when the midsize SUV died in favor of the GMC Envoy as the GMC brand began moving up-market to distinguish itself from the Chevrolet Trailblazer.

Some purists would likely argue that GM’s off-road SUV should be the Chevrolet Blazer, which arguably has more off-road legacy than the Jimmy (though both were always based on the same underpinnings). I argue that GMC should be GM’s Jeep play though, for many reasons.

With Ford entering the segment and Jeep upping its game, it’s going to be highly competitive. In any market segment you either steal business from your competitors or you grow the segment with new buyers. This all has to be balanced with the fact that the vehicle has to be profitable to justify a business case to produce it in the first place, all the while advancing the company’s ability to meet stringent new fuel economy standards.

Basically it sounds impossible after discussing all of that, but that’s why I argue GMC should get this vehicle. GM really can’t afford to have it sell in high volumes or else it would negatively impact the company’s corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) numbers, which are going to climb all the way to 54.5 mpg by 2025 unless President-elect Donald Trump wishes to change that.

The fuel economy standards are likely to lead to a lot of aluminum in the vehicle, which isn’t cheap. This means the price tag isn’t going to be cheap either. So, a moderately priced off-road SUV that carries a moderately high price tag and sells in modest volumes.

Does that not reek of GMC?

There’s also the marketing aspect to this type of vehicle. Buyers of this segment are often loyal and brand conscious. The Buick-GMC sales channel is prime for this type of buyer since the brands are niche players and not the high-volume, more pedestrian brand that is Chevrolet.

GM likely already has the parts to build this vehicle. The 31xx architecture that underpins the Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon could likely serve as a basis for it. GM already produces the global Trailblazer SUV on a variant of this chassis.

Is this something GM would do? It’s hard to say. On one hand the company is an eager participant in niche segments with vehicles like the Camaro ZL1 and now Colorado ZR2. On the other hand, they have huge holes in their lineup, such as the lack of a hot-hatch or even hotter versions of their mainstream products to combat Ford’s Sport products.

Regardless, the nostalgia returning to the SUV world is sort of exciting and GM should get in on the action. The Wrangler and Bronco can’t have all the fun, not when GM has a viable brand to combat Jeep globally, they has just chosen not to leverage it thus far.



About Nick Saporito

AutoVerdict Senior Editor Nick Saporito began writing about cars at age 13. Nick ran a couple of automotive enthusiast sites for several years, before taking some time off to focus on his career and education. By day he's a marketing executive in the telecom world and by night he hangs out here at AV. You'll find him focusing on tech, design and the industry's future.
Thoughts?! We're all about community! Sound off in the comments, share your review or join the discussion in our forum.

Leave a Comment

 Latest Forum Messages
  1. nadepalma
    Not sure if they should dust off the Jimmy name. I always thought it was a silly name, and to be honest, it doesn't fit GMC's new "direction" in being a more premium (and hopefully, off-road focused) brand.

    In that regard, I'd rather see them dust off the Envoy name, or come up with another name altogether.
    Frankly, if GMC wants to remain upscale from their GM counterparts, resurrecting "Jimmy" is not the way to go. I always thought that name made that SUV sound like a child compared to the Blazer nameplate......

    Cort, www.oldcarsstronghearts.com

    pig&cowValves.paceMaker * 1979 CC to 2003 MGM + 81mc

    "If you'll hand me my crayons, I'll be glad to take your name" | John Conlee | 'I Don't Remember Loving You'
    Just call it a GMC Hummer.
    I like the concept, but agree with everyone else that Jimmy is a weird nameplate.
    Jimmy is slang for (I wish I lived in a world where I could speak as an adult) a man's "private part". Last thing I want is a car is a "Richard".

    Now if it's shaped like one;someone I know may buy 2 Jimmies.
Welcome to AutoVerdict: News, Reviews, Community